<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>software-libre on Dr. SeViR</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/software-libre/</link><description>Recent content in software-libre on Dr. SeViR</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/software-libre/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The price of free software for a programmer</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-price-of-free-software-for-a-programmer/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-price-of-free-software-for-a-programmer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We often equate (even within the IT world) &lt;em&gt;Free Software&lt;/em&gt; with &lt;em&gt;FREE OF CHARGE&lt;/em&gt;. I hear plenty of clients tell me &amp;ldquo;Use free software, it costs nothing, so it&amp;rsquo;ll be cheaper.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The usual way to argue this always starts with &lt;em&gt;Free&lt;/em&gt; as in freedom being different from &lt;em&gt;free of charge&lt;/em&gt;, a confusion that comes from a poor translation of the word &lt;em&gt;FREE&lt;/em&gt; in &lt;em&gt;Free Software&lt;/em&gt;, the original English term. But even so, when we think of Free Software, we think of free of charge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>