<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>opinion on Dr. SeViR</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/opinion/</link><description>Recent content in opinion on Dr. SeViR</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/opinion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The truth about operating systems: let's talk about Windows</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-lets-talk-about-windows/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-lets-talk-about-windows/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With years of history behind it, when someone talks about operating systems, the first thing that comes to mind is Windows. Loved and criticised in equal measure, there&amp;rsquo;s no denying it has long been the most widely used desktop operating system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The truth about operating systems: Linux for users</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-linux-for-users/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-linux-for-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are plenty of Windows, Linux and MacOSX fanatics. I&amp;rsquo;ve spent years using all of them, and each has its good points and its bad ones. For those who haven&amp;rsquo;t tried them but are curious, here are a few opinions. In this post we&amp;rsquo;ll talk about Linux, philosophies aside, from a user&amp;rsquo;s point of view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The truth about operating systems: MacOSX</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-macosx/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-macosx/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After quite a few years as a MacOSX user, and having grown disillusioned over the last year, I have a pretty well-formed opinion of the joys and headaches a MacOSX machine can bring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;rsquo;s operating systems have always been known for good performance and for being optimised for graphics and video work. One of their big leaps forward, and a bet on the future, was going with a UNIX kernel while keeping a superb graphics layer and an easy-to-use interface. That&amp;rsquo;s how the MacOSX series was born.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The price of free software for a programmer</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-price-of-free-software-for-a-programmer/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-price-of-free-software-for-a-programmer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We often equate (even within the IT world) &lt;em&gt;Free Software&lt;/em&gt; with &lt;em&gt;FREE OF CHARGE&lt;/em&gt;. I hear plenty of clients tell me &amp;ldquo;Use free software, it costs nothing, so it&amp;rsquo;ll be cheaper.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The usual way to argue this always starts with &lt;em&gt;Free&lt;/em&gt; as in freedom being different from &lt;em&gt;free of charge&lt;/em&gt;, a confusion that comes from a poor translation of the word &lt;em&gt;FREE&lt;/em&gt; in &lt;em&gt;Free Software&lt;/em&gt;, the original English term. But even so, when we think of Free Software, we think of free of charge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>