<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>macosx on Dr. SeViR</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/macosx/</link><description>Recent content in macosx on Dr. SeViR</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.sevir.org/en/tags/macosx/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The truth about operating systems: MacOSX</title><link>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-macosx/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.sevir.org/en/blog/the-truth-about-operating-systems-macosx/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After quite a few years as a MacOSX user, and having grown disillusioned over the last year, I have a pretty well-formed opinion of the joys and headaches a MacOSX machine can bring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;rsquo;s operating systems have always been known for good performance and for being optimised for graphics and video work. One of their big leaps forward, and a bet on the future, was going with a UNIX kernel while keeping a superb graphics layer and an easy-to-use interface. That&amp;rsquo;s how the MacOSX series was born.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>